The s Defence Of Injustice - 1733 Words

In this essay I will discuss Glaucon’s defence of injustice, which he presents to Socrates in book 11 of Plato’s The Republic. For the purposes of this paper, I will focus on the overriding theme in Glaucon’s argument; that we are only just for the sake of consequences and will conclude by agreeing with this notion. Glaucon, dissatisfied with previous appraisals of justice, seeks to challenge Socrates by strengthening Thrasymachus’ defence of injustice in book 1. ‘This is exactly what he gives us – 3 arguments that support Thrasymachus’ view that injustice itself is more choice worthy than justice itself’. He begins with a division of goods into three classes, placing justice in his third category; things we do not choose for their own sake but only for their consequences. Under this category also comes physical training, medical treatment and wage earning and the like, leading to the argument that justice, being difficult to obtain, is only prized for its worthwhile consequences. This is purely hypothetical, for Glaucon is really asking Socrates to defend his, (alongside Socrates himself, and Adeimatus’) view that justice is to be valued for its own sake – subsiding in the second category of goods Glaucon presents of things desirable both in themselves and for the sake of their consequences. To follow, he states what he believes most people think about justice (evident from his repetition of the phrase ‘they say’) – that to do wrong is in itself a desirable thing, but toShow MoreRelatedStare Decisis And Judicial Precedent1414 Words   |  6 Pagestherefore do not create a binding but a persuasive precedent, which judges can refer to but are not required to do so. The case of R V Howe Bannister stated that â€Å"duress† is not an available defence in murder. The obiter dicta of this case was followed in R V Gotts (1992) 2 AC 412 , which held that such defence was equally not available for the offence of attempted murder . Case law is based on authoritative premises that leaded to the creation of a court structure founded in hierarchical principlesRead MorePros And Cons Of Anarchy1336 Words   |  6 Pages17th century English philosopher, believed isolated individuals live in a state of war. He insisted that there is no such thing as a common power, which as a result means there is no law. Consequently, there is no right and wrong, or justice and injustice. Because man is always in competition, the possibility of war remains always present. Hobbes believed there are three causes of quarrel in humans: competition, diffidence, and reputation. Furthermore, in the natural state humans invade for gain,Read MoreThe Police Code Act Of 18991711 Words   |  7 Pagestreatment should be severely taken into consideration if a crime results from the relationship as it can alter reasonable thought process due to the negative implications of the abuse. This is what the Criminal Code (Abusive Domestic Relationship Defence and Another Matter) Amendment Bill 2009 (Qld) aims to provide- and the details and effectiveness of it will be further discussed in this essay. 3. Outline of amendment 1. Outline the relevant legislation regarding this area of the law. 2.Read MoreTo Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee- an essay on how justice and injustice is represented in the novel.1482 Words   |  6 Pages...in this country our courts are the great levellers, and in our courts all men are created equal. Describe and explain how justice and injustice are represented through events and characters in To Kill a Mockingbird. Justice, what is right and fair by all of societys standards and morals, is represented, along with injustice, through events and characters in To Kill a Mockingbird. ...in this country our courts are the great levellers, and in our courts all men are created equal. (AtticusRead MoreThe Islamic State Known As Isis986 Words   |  4 PagesDeclared Obama in an interview with New Yorker on January 2014 (qtd. in Thiessen). It s extremely unsettling that the President of the United States of America would have underestimated a terrorist threat coming from the Middle East, especially an Al Qaeda affiliate. Considering what Al Qaeda did to America on 9/11, Obama s unwillingness to act is a disgrace to this country. When Obama finally decided to act his defence tactics were ill managed and effective. The airstrikes ultimately did not weakenRead MoreMy Decision For Pursue Medicine Essay989 Words   |  4 Pagesproblem. Corruption breeds injustice. It undermines individual’s values. Just like how physicians are the first line of defence against medical ailments, lawyers are the weapon against corruption. Lawyers have the moral obligation and duty to prosecute injustices. Growing up in Iran I awarded me a first-person view of such corruption. The judicial system of Iran is one rooted in religion, oppression, and censorship. Even as a young child I recognized the inequality and injustices suffered by its citizensRead MoreKarl Marx973 Words   |  4 Pagesmost of his life studying, thinking and writing about history and economics. A many years of study, much of it spent in England, he believed that he understood more deeply than anyone who had ever lived before him why there is injustice i world. He said that all injustice and inequality is a result of one underlying conflict in society. He called it a class struggle, that is, a conflict bet the class of people who can afford to own money- producing businesses, whom he called capitalists or theRead MoreLegal Intervention For Implementation Of Conjugal Rights Essay1527 Words   |  7 Pagesexclude various employees from its ambit like travel guide, businessmen, etc., which would be gross injustice to punish someone for the nature of their means of livelihood.[ Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, (1897) P 24 at 26.] and on wife’s refusal to give up her job if the husband refuses to cohabit he’ll be the deserter.[ Ibid.] The phrase â€Å"withdrawal from the society of other †[ Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 9.] does not mean withdrawal of one spouse from the physical company but from the conjugal relationshipRead MoreThe Institution Of Marriage Act Essay1568 Words   |  7 Pagesexclude various employees from its ambit like travel guide, businessmen, etc., which would be gross injustice to punish someone for the nature of their means of livelihood.[ Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, (1897) P 24 at 26.] and on wife’s refusal to gi ve up her job if the husband refuses to cohabit he’ll be the deserter.[ Ibid.] The phrase â€Å"withdrawal from the society of other †[ Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 9.] does not mean withdrawal of one spouse from the physical company but from the conjugal relationshipRead MoreNotes On The Principle Behind Estoppel1749 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction to promissory estoppel The principle behind estoppel is to prevent injustice owing to inconsistency or fraud. There are two general types of estoppel: promissory (or equitable) and legal. Promissory estoppel means where the representator induces the relying party to believe that whatever rights within their contracts are not be enforced. Promissory estoppel is the principle of Justice and equity. Estoppel occurs when a party reasonably relies on the promise of another party, or to prevent